On 2007.06.21 18:10:50 +0000, Carlo Wood wrote: > > I am glad to see that you found a real reason for why it might have > gone wrong. Just not initializing because it's not needed, but not > understanding WHY it went wrong would have been rather unsatisfactory. > yes, I understand, but it looks we did the wrong thing in the first step, so... Thanks for testing this! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Wang Zhenyu <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Wang Zhenyu <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- From: Wang Zhenyu <[email protected]>
- [PATCH][AGPGART] intel_agp: don't load if no IGD and AGP port
- From: Wang Zhenyu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH][AGPGART] intel_agp: don't load if no IGD and AGP port
- From: Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.22-rc5 regression
- Prev by Date: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
- Next by Date: Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][AGPGART] intel_agp: don't load if no IGD and AGP port
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH][AGPGART] intel_agp: don't load if no IGD and AGP port
- Index(es):
 |