On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I can understand why no data is saved by this change: gcc is aligning
> the next field to a natural boundary anyway and we dont really have
> arrays of spinlocks (fortunately).
Actually, some data structures could well shrink.
Look at "struct task_struct", for example. Right now it has two spinlocks
right next to each other (alloc_lock and pi_lock).
Other data structures may have things like bitfields etc.
But yeah, I'd not expect that to be very common, and in some cases you
might have to re-order data structures to take advantage of better
packing, and even then it's probably not all that noticeable.
> but this is certainly not something for 2.6.22, it's an early 2.6.23
> matter i suspect.
Oh, absolutely.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
