On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 20, 2007 11:29 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > If you apply this patch and then you can f.e. try this:
> >
> > mount -tramfs -o10 none /media
>
> > @@ -164,10 +165,15 @@ static int ramfs_fill_super(struct super
> > + if (options && *options)
> > + order = simple_strtoul(options, NULL, 10);
>
> This is probably a bad name for a mount option. What about "order=10"?
> Otherwise you prevent any other option from being used in the future.
I tried to make it as simple as possible. The patch is primarily useful as
a debugging aid since it eliminates the lower layers from the game. I
think ramfs should be left as is sine it is intended as a minimal
implementation that should stay simpl.
If we really want such an option for good then it may best be added to
shmem or ramdisk drivers?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
