On 6/20/07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
but the signature isn't part of the kernel
But some would argue that it's part of the source with which the binary is derived (only a court could meaningfully decide if they're right).
and the code that checks the signature is completely independant.
Irrelevant.
and finally the PVR functions are not part of the kernel
Booting is. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "Tomas Neme" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Michael Poole <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "Tomas Neme" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Michael Poole <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Michael Poole <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: linux-2.6.22-rc5-g7c8545e build #298 failed b/c of Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:amd_init_mtrr
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):
 |