Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
The other choice that we developers usually make is to run either testing
or unstable. "stable" is a synonym for obsolete ;-).
I'm just not going to let this go. Stable is synonymous with, well
ummm, "stable." That means that I don't have 3000 changes a month, it's
secure and the unexpected doesn't happen. It means I can write a
lecture explaining how git works. ...do updates... then expect my
lecture to still work the next day. It means writing local shell
scripts and expecting them to work until the NEXT stable release without
changes. It means knowing what things WILL break if and when I do go to
the next version.
Stable is a CHOICE not a punishment.
--
Jeffrey Hundstad
PS. Running unstable on my laptop... and running stable on my servers.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
