Re: [patch 10/26] SLUB: Faster more efficient slab determination for __kmalloc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 02:58:48 -0700
> > > [email protected] wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +	BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
> > > > +		(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE & (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE - 1)));
> > > 
> > > BUILD_BUG_ON?
> > > 
> > Does not matter. That code is __init.
> 
> Finding out at compile time is better.

Ok and BUILD_BUG_ON really works? Had some bad experiences with it.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2.orig/mm/slub.c	2007-06-19 15:36:57.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/mm/slub.c	2007-06-19 15:37:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -3079,7 +3079,7 @@ void __init kmem_cache_init(void)
 	 * Make sure that nothing crazy happens if someone starts tinkering
 	 * around with ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
 	 */
-	BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE > 256 ||
 		(KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE & (KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE - 1)));
 
 	for (i = 8; i < KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE;i++)
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux