Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Yes but tdskb:foo.mac[1013,1013,frob];4 is *not* elegant.
I think describing VMS pathname syntax as "not elegant" is kind of like
describing George W. Bush as "not a genius."
> POSIX is very
> clear about what is acceptable as magic in a pathname, and the unix spec
> even more so. The NetApp approach recognizes two important things
>
> 1. Old version access is the oddity not the norm
> 2. Standards behaviour is important
>
3. An atomic snapshot is more useful than a bunch of disconnected
per-file version. Kind of like CVS vs SVN.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
