Le mardi 19 juin 2007 à 21:56 +0200, Diego Calleja a écrit : > Please, stop pretending you are hardware manufacturers. You are not. Please, stop pretending the end user has no say in the GPL. The GPL (v2 or v3) is written with the end user not the hardware manufacturer in mind. Also I can tell you the enterprises who make the living of Red Hat, Novell and IBM (to name some major kernel contributors) care very much about their part of the GPL deal. That is they can dump a supplier (hardware or software) at any moment because he has no lock on their system. Should the kernel devs ally themselves with entities like Tivo who put the vendor lock-in back in free/libre systems, said systems attractivity will decrease sharply (and it only takes a few managers to notice their Linux systems are just as locked as the usual proprietary ones) Tivo didn't make the Linux success. More Tivos can definitely undo it. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
- References:
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: exported fb_find_logo references __initdata
- Next by Date: [PATCH RT] Remove double warning print with faulty preempt disable nesting
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):
 |