Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

[Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>]

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> On 06/19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:14 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > 
> > > The commited "Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals"
> > > (commit caec4e8dc85e0644ec24aeb36285e1ba02da58cc) doesn't implement
> > > this.
> > 
> > Indeed, if you want what Davide described, you need to also change
> > signalfd side. The patch I did merely prevents another thread from
> > dequeuing somebody else private signals.
> 
> Yes I see, but why do we need this change? Yes, we can dequeue SIGSEGV
> from another thread. Just don't do it if you have a handler for SIGSEGV?

I believe it can be confusing to have private signals dequeued from 
another thread. The kernel expect those to be dequeued by the target 
thread.


- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/