Re: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> The commited "Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals"
> (commit caec4e8dc85e0644ec24aeb36285e1ba02da58cc) doesn't implement
> this.
> 
> We can do something like
> 
> 	int signalfd_dequeue_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, sigset_t *mask, siginfo_t *info)
> 	{
> 		if (tsk->tgid == current->tgid)
> 			tsk = current;
> 
> 		return dequeue_signal(tsk, mask, info);
> 	}
> 
> (still I can't understand why should we change signalfd).

Yes, of course. I was waiting for Ben's patch to go in, before fixing 
signalfd. I did not know if Linus would have acked that.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux