On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 schrieb Chuck Ebbert:
> >
> >> Try disabling CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND
> >>
> >> [usb developers: what are the drawbacks of doing this?]
> >
> > Increased power consumption.
>
> speaking of CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND, I've encountered at least one device -- a
> Canon EOS 5D camera -- that, after the bus suspends, must be powercycled
> in order to return the camera's interrupt endpoints to a functional state.
> How are these types of problems handled, currently? Is this something for
> a blacklist?
There are a few possible approaches. One is indeed a blacklist, to
prevent the camera from automatically being suspended. Another is to
prevent it by changing a device parameter in sysfs.
Note that neither of these will help if you do a suspend-to-RAM. That
suspends everything.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
