Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

> The GPL was never about allowing you to load modified software onto hardware
> where the legitimate creators/owners of that hardware say, "no, you may not
> modify the software running on this hardware".

Good try but you had to add creators there so the sentence actually
supported your opinion. It's still an obvious alien insert.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Chinese translated version of Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
• Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]