Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Schwartz <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:06:04 +0200
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Organization: Adresse perso
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

> The GPL was never about allowing you to load modified software onto hardware
> where the legitimate creators/owners of that hardware say, "no, you may not
> modify the software running on this hardware".

Good try but you had to add creators there so the sentence actually
supported your opinion. It's still an obvious alien insert.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
  - From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Chinese translated version of Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
Next by Date: Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Next by thread: RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux