Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:09:19 +0200, Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It is mature enough to remove EXPERIMENTAL label from RTC_CLASS, isn't
> > > it?
> > 
> >  I'd say yes, I will submit a patch. ty.
> 
>  RTC class is mature enough.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>

Thanks.  I suppose this helps dropping CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL from some
defconfigs.

---
Atsushi Nemoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
    • From: Atsushi Nemoto <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
    • From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
    • From: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Question about a strange behavior of copy_to_user() in ioctl call
• Next by Date: Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].
• Previous by thread: Re: [rtc-linux] RTC_CLASS is still considered as EXPERIMENTAL?
• Next by thread: [patch 0/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : IBS implementation for AMD64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]