RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > But you're not the user of the software on my laptop.  I am.

> ahh, but by your own argument you aren't

Let's not confuse owner with user and let's not confuse ownership of
copyrights with ownership of particular copies.

> the software on your laptop is owned by people like Linus, Al Viro, David
> M, Alan Cox, etc.

No. The copyright to the software is owned by those people. But particular
copies of copyrighted items can be owned by other people.

> they have the right to put a license on that software that would require
> you to give them access to your hardware (after all, that's the argument
> that you are useing to justify requireing Tivo to give you access
> to their hardware)

That's right, they do have that right so long as they condition it on the
exercise of something I could not do without their permission. (Ignoring for
the moment the fact that the software is a derivative work of GPL'd
software.)

I'm not sure whether you think this disagrees with or refutes anything I've
said.

DS


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux