On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:36:00 -0000, Thomas Gleixner said: > The following patch series contains: > > - dyntick bugfixes for -mm (caused by the cpuidle changes in ACPI) > > - updates and improvements to high resolution timer / dynticks > > - high resolution timer / dynticks support for x86_64 Am running with the 22-rc4-mm2-hrt4 patch on my Latitude D820. Mostly seems to work, but for some reason the Intel 'powertop' util thinks it's 100% busy: PowerTOP version 1.7 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation Cn Avg residency (5s) P-states (frequencies) C0 (cpu running) (100.0%) C1 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 2.00 Ghz 0.0% C2 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 1.67 Ghz 0.0% C3 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 1333 Mhz 0.0% 1000 Mhz 100.0% In reality: [/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle] for i in */*; do echo -n "$i: "; cat $i; done state0/latency: 1 state0/power: 1000 state0/time: 0 state0/usage: 3 state1/latency: 1 state1/power: 500 state1/time: 1756017623 state1/usage: 1837402 state2/latency: 57 state2/power: 100 state2/time: -159524787 state2/usage: 15007443 I think we have a 32/64 bit issue on state2/time which is probably borking things up....
Attachment:
pgp83Q457zeF4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- RE: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- References:
- [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- Prev by Date: Re: SATA problems
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 03/26] Slab allocators: Consistent ZERO_SIZE_PTR support and NULL result semantics
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- Next by thread: RE: [patch-mm 00/25] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support - V2
- Index(es):