Re: [patch 00/26] Current slab allocator / SLUB patch queue

["Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>]

On 18/06/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > Still the same.
>
> Is it still exactly the same strack trace?

Not exactly the same
[<c0480d4b>] list_locations+0x257/0x2ad
is the only difference

l *list_locations+0x257
0xc1080d4b is in list_locations (mm/slub.c:3655).
3650                                    l->min_pid);
3651
3652                    if (num_online_cpus() > 1 && !cpus_empty(l->cpus) &&
3653                                    n < PAGE_SIZE - n - 60) {
3654                            n += sprintf(buf + n, " cpus=");
3655                            n += cpulist_scnprintf(buf + n,
PAGE_SIZE - n - 50,
3656                                            l->cpus);
3657                    }
3658
3659                    if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !nodes_empty(l->nodes) &&


> There could be multiple issue
> if we overflow PAGE_SIZE there.

Regards,
Michal

--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/