Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2007, Al Boldi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Under what circumstances would it be possible to receive permission for
> > modification?
>
> You have to ask the copyright holder.
>
> Affero did just that, and so the Affero GPL was born.
>
> Just don't assume the FSF will grant such permissions lightly.

But wouldn't this be against the spirit of the GPL?


Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Tim Post <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by Date: Re: Versioning file system
• Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]