On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Gabor Czigola wrote:
Hello!
I didn't follow the whole thread from the beginning, but I see that
there are pros and cons for both versions of GPL.
I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.
I guess to have an own version of the GPL license could also help to
resolve (future) dual-licensing problems.
well, for one thing creating a kernel-only license would immediatly make
the kernel incompatible with all the GPLv2 code that's around.
that wouldn't be a win for anyone except people who want to lill linux.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
