Re: v2.6.21.4-rt11

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:49 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
> > > There are many choices and
> > > I don't know what is the more friendly. By friendly I mean the one that
> > > is likely to be merged and that cooperate with you.
> >
> > Which choices do you mean ?
> 
> I mean implementations. I've seen lot of them but i don't know which one
> to try (I'm new to RT and the implementation in this thread seems to
> be very nice).

Thanks :)

> > >   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/patch-2.6.21.4-rt14
> > >
> > > : undefined reference to `usecs_to_cycles'
> > > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> >
> > Which ARM sub arch ?
> 
> sub arch AT91 -- (Atmel AT91RM9200 processor).

It lacks support for the generic timeofday and clock event layers, which
causes the compile breakage.

I take a look at the compile errors and ping somebody who is working on
support for AT91 to send out the patches ASAP.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/