Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Michael Gerdau <mgd@technosis.de>]

> On Friday 15 June 2007 18:59:14 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So it's true: the GPL just gives you rights, and without it you have no
> > rights (other than fair use ones etc), and blah blah. But the distinction
> > between "license" vs "contract" really isn't a very important one in any
> > case.
> 
> Er, copyright law is federal, contract law is generally state level?  So not 
> only does contract law vary a lot more by jurisdiction, but it's enforced by 
> different courts than suits over copyright?  (You'll notice the GPL doesn't 
> say which state law holds sway.  If it was a contract this would be kind of 
> important.)

That seems to be a special property of the US legal system. At least I'm
not aware of this or a similar distinction in e.g. germany (or most parts
of europe AFAIK).

Best,
Michael
-- 
 Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
 Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
 Michael Gerdau       email: mgd@technosis.de
 GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.