Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

> > > What matters is *my* intent in *choosing* the GPLv2, not *his* 
> > > intent in writing it.
> > 
> > I beg to differ. By adopting _his_ license you adopted his view. [...]
> 
> ianal, but fortunately that's not what the law is. The license says what 
> it says, and that is what controls. The intent of the author (of Linus 
> and other copyright holders) is a secondary source of information /if 
> and only if/ any ambiguity of meaning arises (as determined by a judge, 
> not by you or me). But the opinion and intent of RMS (unless adopted by 
> Linus) is quite immaterial.

I agree with the "/if and only if/ any ambiguity of meaning arises" part.
I'm sorry I didn't make that clear before.

However if that situation arises (i.e. the judge decides there is an
ambiguity) then as far as my experience tells me it is the intention of
the author (RMS et al in this case) that counts. But I erred before...

Best wishes,
Michael
-- 
 Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
 Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
 Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
 Michael Gerdau       email: [email protected]
 GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux