Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 13:27 -0400, Rob Landley a écrit :

> Er, yes and no.
> 
> The GPL evolved from the "Emacs License", and _that_ was heavily influenced by 
> Stallman's fight with James Gosling over Gosling revoking permission to use 
> Gosmacs code in GNU Emacs after Gosling sold his codebase to a commercial 
> entity.
> 
> http://www.free-soft.org/gpl_history/

no and yes :)

The second paragraph of this page makes the GNU philosophy the other
source of the GPL, and that was definitively influenced by the printer
incident

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

---

• References:
  • RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: coding style
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64: Scalability improvement of gettimeofday with jitter compensation
• Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]