Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 13:27 -0400, Rob Landley a écrit : > Er, yes and no. > > The GPL evolved from the "Emacs License", and _that_ was heavily influenced by > Stallman's fight with James Gosling over Gosling revoking permission to use > Gosmacs code in GNU Emacs after Gosling sold his codebase to a commercial > entity. > > http://www.free-soft.org/gpl_history/ no and yes :) The second paragraph of this page makes the GNU philosophy the other source of the GPL, and that was definitively influenced by the printer incident -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
- References:
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
- RE: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: coding style
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64: Scalability improvement of gettimeofday with jitter compensation
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):