Alan Cox wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:42:50 +0530How much better performance i will get?How long is a piece of string. Given you don't give any hardware info, any info on the applications run or on the network and capacity expected its a bit hard to guess really.
Detail: I think that is a good idea if hard-users (as kernel developers) had a local to host yours .config file, specifying hadware.
E.g. I have a laptop Toshiba M45-S355 (with ReiserFS) and don't have experience to choose what I can remove from kernel (or compile as module/built-in).
So, is a great idea use pre-config file to compile a new kernel with best options.
My .config file (2.6.21.1) and lspci is attached. Best regards, Renato S. Yamane
Attachment:
lspci.txt
Description: plain/text
Attachment:
config_2.6.21.1.txt
Description: plain/text
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- References:
- Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- From: "Nobin Mathew" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [GIT PULL] KVM fix for 2.6.22
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming
- Index(es):
 |