> > For the parts used by the processors in question yes
>
> That means? They're expected to run only a subset of the network stack?
> Is that expressed in Kconfig? Is it documented that the rest is dangerous?
Have you audited every other line of code for every other kind of bug ?
> > people have done
> > that work so using the types without unaligned.
>
> Very brave; we're talking about around half a million lines
> of non trivial source code here.
And debug simulators that can be made to trap such accesses, and in most
cases processors which fault such an access (so you find it) but don't
provide enough information to restart.
The testing isn't that hard for a given embedded system and having done
work Linux does not need other changes re-breaking things.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
