Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is 
> flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.

My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable.
We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear
whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns.

Thanks,
Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]