Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1

Ingo Molnar wrote:

> i'd still like to hear back from Kirill & co whether this framework is 
> flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.

My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look ready/suitable.
We need to have a working SMP version before it will be clear
whether the whole approach is good and works correct on variety of load patterns.

Thanks,
Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce compat_u64 and compat_s64 types
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]