On Friday 15 June 2007 04:19, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I will state one more time: I think that what Tivo did was and is: > > (a) perfectly legal wrt the GPLv2 (and I have shown multiple times why > your arguments don't hold logical water - if you actually followed > them yourself, you wouldn't be using a redhat.com email address!) Linus, Harald Welte managed to get the keys from Siemens, which sold a "tivoized" Linux router. As typical for German courts, he got the key in a settlement, so there's no citable court verdict (totally, he AFAIK got two court verdicts up to now). But the way settlements work in Germany suggests that it's likely that the court would have decided that way*. So there is no verdict on this question, but a strong hint that you are wrong, at least under German law (which is not the best money can buy ;-). And as Tivo doesn't sell their crap into Germany, we can't test it with them. It's you who think the GPLv2 is tit-for-tat, not the FSF, and it's not in the text of the GPLv2; this is your private misinterpretation. The GPLv2 is "transitive", i.e. everybody receives the same rights, nobody is entitled to take rights from others (the only person to choose is the author), and this certainly includes technical means (even if it does not explicitely say so), and the GPLv3 is just the same (it's just more readable). All arguments from your side put up are straw men like "hardware vs. software" and such. BTW: Hardware as it is done today (chips, printed circuit boards, etc.) is copyrighted as well, as it is much cheaper to copy hardware than to develop it. *) German judges want to resolve civil cases by settlements. They let the parties pass a few arguments, and indicate which way the judge possibly would decide to help them settle fast. Settlement is way cheaper than a court verdict, so most sane people choose to settle (unfortunately it's often the insane people who go to court ;-). -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://www.jwdt.com/~paysan/
Attachment:
pgpPtSR85epf1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):