Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable

<added Daniel to CC:>

On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Should we put these patches in 2.6.21-stable?
> 
> Gentoo developers did a full backport:
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=118047865916766&w=2

I think it looks way too big.

If there are smaller patches, it might be a bit more reasonable.

Are there reported bugs that this patchset fixes?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
    • From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
  • Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
    • From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
• Next by Date: Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)
• Previous by thread: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
• Next by thread: Re: [stable] libata spindown patches for 2.6.21-stable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]