Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Jun 13, 2007, [email protected] wrote:

> since the latest draft of the GPLv3 now discriminates against some
> uses (industrial vs commercial I think are the terms used) 

  A "User Product" is either (1) a "consumer product," which means any
  tangible personal property which is normally used for personal,
  family, or household purposes, or (2) anything designed or sold for
  incorporation into a dwelling.

> does it even qualify as a Open Source lincense anymore by the OSI
> terms?

The definition is about the hardware, not the software, so it may
still qualify.

Alexandre Oliva
FSF Latin America Board Member
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   [email protected]{,}
Free Software Evangelist  [email protected]{,}
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux