Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >  USB
> > 
> >  Subject    : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but 
> >  was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> >  References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> >  Submitter  : Paulo Pereira <[email protected]>
> >  Handled-By : Alan Stern <[email protected]>
> >  Patch      : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> >  Status     : patch was suggested
> 
> I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?

I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch 
should have fixed it.  But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our 
queries, we can't be certain.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux