Re: [patch] new aop loop fix

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
> Btw: Nick's patches broke  LO_CRYPT_XOR mode,

It would help him if you could describe how.

> but it is ok because
> this feature was absolete and not used by anyone, am i right here?

I know nothing of this; but so long as its code remains in the driver,
I'd say we should be supporting it rather than breaking it.

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH] deny partial write for loop dev fd
    • From: Dmitriy Monakhov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch] new aop loop fix
    • From: Dmitriy Monakhov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] new aop loop fix
    • From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] new aop loop fix
    • From: Dmitriy Monakhov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patch related with Fork Bobmbing Attack
• Next by Date: Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions v2
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] new aop loop fix
• Next by thread: [PATCH] deny partial write for loop dev fd
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]