Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL

From: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:59:16 +0900

> At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT),
> David Miller wrote:
>  
> > 2) It is much better to add the appropriate CONFIG_SYSCTL
> >    ifdefs to the INET code than to force it on for everyone.
> 
> It examined that, but many corrections become necessary.

I understand, but embedded people will not be happy that
SYSFS is a requirement for IPV4 networking.  Every little
bit of space savings matters for them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Yoshinori Sato <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Add per clocksource hook to settimeofday().
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_INET depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]