Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep

[Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>]

Hi.

On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tuesday, 12 June 2007 00:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > Hi.
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
> > and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
> > useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
> > install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
> > debugging info and perhaps even get it going.
> 
> I like this idea.
> 
> > Yes, Pavel, I'll supply a patch if you (plural) agree.
> 
> I agree.  :-)

Ok. I'll take Pavel's silence as agreement too. I'll be a little slow
(as usual, nowadays!), but will try to get it done next week. I think I
can in clear conscience do it on Redhat time if I don't manage it
beforehand.

Regards,

Nigel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part