Re: fix placement of inline keyword.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:30:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:

> gcc gets whiney about the placement of 'inline' at some warning levels.
>...

Since most of them are in C files, can you remove these when you are at it?
 
> --- linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c~	2007-04-04 19:34:50.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.20.noarch/arch/ia64/sn/pci/pcibr/pcibr_ate.c	2007-04-04 19:34:56.000000000 -0400
> @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static inline u64 __iomem *pcibr_ate_add
>  /*
>   * Update the ate.
>   */
> -void inline
> +inline void
>  ate_write(struct pcibus_info *pcibus_info, int ate_index, int count,
>  	  volatile u64 ate)
>  {
>...

And some are even non-static inline functions...

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux