On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:15:41 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 12 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:44:50 +0200 Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > splice
> > > >
> > > > btw, I'm staring in profound mystification at this:
> > > >
> > > > int generic_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > > > struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> > > > {
> > > > struct page *page = buf->page;
> > > >
> > > > if (page_count(page) == 1) {
> > > > lock_page(page);
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > return 1;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > afacit that `if page_count(page)' test could be replaced by
> > > > `if today_is_tuesday()'. But then I don't have the foggiest idea
> > > > what it's trying to do.
> > > >
> > > > It would be nice to get some comments in and around here.
> > > >
> > > > Also, I was trying to work out the role and responsibility of the ->pin
> > > > callback, and gave up.
> > > >
> > > > There isn't a lot of point in explaining this over email - one should be
> > > > able to gain an understanding of these things by reading the code. I think
> > > > the best way of tackling this would be to comprehensively document
> > > > pipe_buf_operations and pipe_inode_info, please...
> > >
> > > OK so I wont explain it in detail here, I'll write up a good set of
> > > comments tonight.
> >
> > I'll merge this into the #splice branch.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> > +/**
> > + * generic_pipe_buf_steal - attempt to take ownership of a @pipe_buffer
> > + * @pipe: the pipe that the buffer belongs to
> > + * @buf: the buffer to attempt to steal
> > + *
> > + * Description:
> > + * This function attempts to steal the @struct page attached to
> > + * @buf. If successful, this function returns 0 and returns with
> > + * the page locked. The caller may then reuse the page for whatever
> > + * he wishes, the typical use is insertion into a different file
> > + * page cache.
> > + */
> > int generic_pipe_buf_steal(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe,
> > struct pipe_buffer *buf)
> > {
> > struct page *page = buf->page;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * A reference of one is golden, that means that the owner of this
> > + * page is the only one holding a reference to it. lock the page
> > + * and return OK.
> > + */
> > if (page_count(page) == 1) {
> > lock_page(page);
> > return 0;
>
> I still don't get this code. I guess I should have asked for pipe_buffer
> docs too ;)
I just love commenting stuff, so I'll treat you to a pipe_buffer
commentary as well :-)
> What sorts of pages can find themselves inside a pipe_buffer, and which of
> these types of pages is the above test detecting?
Any type of page, really. But for generic_pipe_buf_steal(), it's a page
allocated through alloc_page(). The ops must match the buf contents
(hence it's placed in the pipe_buffer, not the pipe itself). So if you
shoving different pages in there, then your steal function (and others)
must reflect that.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
