First off: sorry for my late answer.
> I agree the ACPI CA is a nuisance. But in this case, we're making
> a mountain out of a molehill. I suspect that if somebody spent the
> 15 minutes to make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
> and the generic Intel one and license it appropriately, Len would
> happily apply the patch.
I hope I got everything right. Here's what I understood so far:
The ACPI Subsystem in the kernel is derived from intel sources. I searched
the web for information about that and finally found
http://www.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads.htm
Is that the right one? So what I would have to do in order to
"make the ARRAY_SIZE patch work in both the Linux ACPI CA
and the generic Intel one" is to modify those sources aswell,
send a patch to Intel and another one back to the
lkml.
Is that right? Or am I totally wrong?
Cheers,
Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
