Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:

> At least in my subjective testing I can't tell any difference anymore,
> so it boils down to design criteria, code size, ability to maintain...

And of course as needed further - preferably at least somewhat 
comparable - test scenarios and benchmarks with realistic workloads. Some 
thoughts about this:

http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007879.html

Regards,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

---

• References:
  • Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular
    • From: Martin Steigerwald <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: splice: move balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() outside of splice actor
• Next by Date: Re: PC speaker
• Previous by thread: Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular
• Next by thread: Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]