Re: ext3fs: umount+sync not enough to guarantee metadata-on-disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> >>Did this succeed?  If the application is still 
> >>truncating that file, the
> >>umount should have failed.
> >
> >Shouldn't sync should wait for truncate to finish?
> 
> The part that gets me here, and that others might be 
> missing,
> is that we are not waiting for ftruncate at this point.
> 
> We're waiting for unlink.  The application that was 
> doing ftruncate
> in tiny little doses has been sent a kill-9 signal, so 
> what should
> be happening now (confirmed by disk activity LEDs) is 
> the file should
> just be getting deleted the same as if we did "rm 
> bigfile" on it.

Well, AFAICT kill-9 signal delivery can take time. It still might be
doing ftruncate.

It would be interesting to know when in that sequence mythtv dies...
or perhaps put loop 'while killall -9 mythtv returns success, sleep 1'
into shutdown scripts?
							Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux