Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

* Tobias Gerschner <[email protected]> wrote:

> The output of massive_intr can be found here :
> http://www.yoper.com/scheduler-test/

here's the spread of the massive_intr results (the average 'jitter' of 
the second column of the results - lower values are indicating more 
stable / more fair massive_intr results, in percentage):

               CFS         SD
            ----------------------
     10:       0.02       0.55
     20:       0.21       0.78
     30:       0.26       0.95
     40:       0.27       1.46
     50:       0.37       1.24
     60:       0.37       0.92

but of course i'm primarily interested is the observed difference in 
interactivity :-)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
    • From: Miguel Figueiredo <[email protected]>
  • Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
    • From: "Tobias Gerschner" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: PC speaker
• Next by Date: [2.6.21.4]: possible recursive locking detected
• Previous by thread: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
• Next by thread: Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]