Re: [-mm patch] #if 0 mm/backing-dev.c:congestion_wait_interruptible()

On 12/06/07, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote:

congestion_wait_interruptible() is no longer used.

Remind me again why it is that we add all these  #if 0  blocks instead
of simply removing the unused code?

It's just creating a janitorial task to go and remove all the #if 0
bits at a later time, seems like pointless churn to me. If the code
needs to go, let's just get rid of it in one go instead of two.

--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [-mm patch] #if 0 mm/backing-dev.c:congestion_wait_interruptible()
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [-mm patch] #if 0 mm/backing-dev.c:congestion_wait_interruptible()
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] blkdev_wait_scan module to help initrd scripts
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix improper .init-type section references
• Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] #if 0 mm/backing-dev.c:congestion_wait_interruptible()
• Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] #if 0 mm/backing-dev.c:congestion_wait_interruptible()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]