On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 01:07:13AM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Zephaniah, > > On Saturday 09 June 2007 04:48, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > EVIOCGRAB is nice and very useful, however over time I've gotten > > multiple requests to make it possible for applications to get events > > straight from the event device while xf86-input-evdev is getting events > > from the same device. > > > > Here is the least invasive patch I could think of, it changes the > > behavior of EVIOCGRAB in some cases, specificly behavior is identical if > > the argument is 0 or 1, however if the argument is true and != 1, then > > it does a 'non exclusive grab', a better name might be handy. > > > > What this does is allow the events to go to everything that's using > > evdev to get events, but grabs it from anything else. About as close to > > what people want as I can get, and fairly non-invasive. > > Unfortunately this also robs non-legacy input handlers (such as > rfkill-input) of input events. Does xf86-input-evdev really needs to > grab devices exclusively? I guess we can't abandon the standard > keyboard driver until X supports hotplugging. How close is it to > support devices coming and going? Er, to explain. The current EVIOCGRAB does an exclusive grab that prohibits rfkill-input and friends from working. As it is the only way to disable the legacy input handlers, xf86-input-evdev has been using it since we added it. The patch is to let us cause only things that use /dev/input/event<n> to get events, thus, a non-exclusive grab. This basicly disables the legacy input handlers, and it's the least invasive patch I could think of. Going for a separate ioctl would also work, but in some ways it would make supporting it more of a pain. I don't care _that_ much either way, as long as we can get a way to disable the legacy events while allowing other things to get the events too. Zephaniah E. Hull. > > If we can't remain as is until X hotplug is ready then I'd rather had > a separate ioctl that disables legacy input handlers (keyboard, mousedev) > for a given input device. > > -- > Dmitry > -- 1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull <[email protected]> 92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801 CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested. Welcome to [telco] hell. [...] You are in a maze of twisty little PVC's, all alike. A switching engineer throws a dart at you! -- Chris Saunderson <[email protected]> in the scary.devil.monastery
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- References:
- [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] via c3/2.6.20 -- ps/2 keyboard doesn't work with console
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
- Index(es):