Re: Can we get rid of zImage this time?

["Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>]

On 6/11/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> I brought this up a few years ago, and had it shot down, because of a
> few poorly substantiated claims of zImage-only machines; those claims
> really need to be debugged since they might indicate A20-related failures.

These beasts are still alive and kicking. I boot a handful of
arm and ppc boards on a frequent basis that are zImage
only.  The kicker is I don't have the bootloader source for
most of them, so changing to a different image format is
tough at best.

Not a vote one way or the other, just some observations
from my day to day.

Bruce


> Anyway...
>
> Can we please kill zImage?  In addition to be completely useless for
> modern kernels, it causes unnecessary complexity in boot loaders.
>
>         -hpa
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/