On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 14:17 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> + dev->revision = get_int_prop(node, "revision-id", 0); > > > > It's not clear to me in the spec if nodes are required to have the > > "revision-id" property. > > It is required for every PCI node. Yep. I was reading the wrong spec :) cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
- From: Auke Kok <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
- From: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 002 of 2] md: Fix bug in error handling during raid1 repair.
- Next by Date: Re: [RFD] Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time
- Next by thread: v2.6.21.4-rt10
- Index(es):
 |