Hi. On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 19:02 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > No, it only supports ext2 (and reading ext3 as if it's ext2). Right now, > > the assumption that syncing during suspend will cause data to hit > > something grub can read isn't a safe one. > > I brought this issue up quite a few years ago at an OLS BOF. We pretty > much need a "supersync" system call; you can do this by bmapping any > file on ext3, but having something supported across filesystems would be > good. Sounds like a good idea to me. Regards, Nigel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- A kexec approach to hibernation
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch-mm 00/23] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support
- Next by Date: Re: ext3fs: umount+sync not enough to guarantee metadata-on-disk
- Previous by thread: Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- Next by thread: Re: A kexec approach to hibernation
- Index(es):