On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 23:42 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:25 +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > > Nope. It's a Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Si 1520 -- Intel Core2 Duo [email protected]. > > Yeah, there are Dell ones which have similar or worse symptoms. > > > Works great with 2.6.21-rt1, and 2.6.22-rc4-hrt5, but that you already > > know :) > > Ok. I go back and figure out which differences we have between > 2.6.21-rt>8 and the -hrt queue. Are you sure it's strictly and HRT issue? I didn't see a !CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS test .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- References:
- 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: "Rui Nuno Capela" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Rui Nuno Capela <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- Prev by Date: Re: libata passthru: support PIO multi commands
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.21-rt2..8 troubles
- Index(es):