Benjamin Gilbert wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:UTF-8 please. Hint: it should most likely be an ö.Whoops, I had thought I had gotten that right. I'll get updates for parts 2 and 3 sent out on Monday.
I'm sending the corrected parts 2 and 3 as replies to this email. The UTF-8 fix is the *only* thing that has changed. The patches themselves are moot in their current form, but I wanted to make sure they were archived with the correct attribution.
--Benjamin Gilbert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for x86_64
- From: Benjamin Gilbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- From: Benjamin Gilbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for x86_64
- References:
- [PATCH 0/3] Add optimized SHA-1 implementations for x86 and x86_64
- From: Benjamin Gilbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- From: Benjamin Gilbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- From: Benjamin Gilbert <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/3] Add optimized SHA-1 implementations for x86 and x86_64
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2: Resume from RAM on HPC nx6325 broken
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- Next by thread: [PATCH] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for i486+
- Index(es):