Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof

<snip>
> I think what was meant here was to remove _all_ the macros that you
> assigned to the ARRAY_SIZE() macro.
Yes, absolutely. I overlooked the 'eg.' in Jan-Benedict's post. Sorry for that.

> If you look at the two advantages replacing code with the ARRAY_SIZE()
> macro has;
> 1. More readable/consistent code.
> 2. Faster compile times, because of less macros being defined.
ack. The arguments for the consistency that I mentioned in my last post
don't hold for a solution that removes all of the macros. So I'm absolutely
fine with a new patch that removes them all.
 
	Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof
    • From: Andi Drebes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof
    • From: Andi Drebes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof
    • From: "Darren Jenkins" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch 1/3] Store interrupt value
• Next by Date: [patch 2/3] Expose Power Management Policy option to users
• Previous by thread: Re: [KJ] Re: [PATCH] drivers/isdn/hisax: ARRAY_SIZE instead of sizeof
• Next by thread: Block device request queue processing question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]