> fs/fuse/inode.c:658:3: error: Initializer entry defined twice
> fs/fuse/inode.c:661:3: also defined here
Duh, that's a stupid conflict. I wonder why I don't get this compile
error...
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Andrew, please send this for 2.6.22.
There's another one, which is -mm only. I'll post a patch.
Thanks,
Miklos
> ---
>
> fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
> @@ -655,10 +655,9 @@ static int fuse_get_sb_blk(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> static struct file_system_type fuseblk_fs_type = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .name = "fuseblk",
> - .fs_flags = FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> .get_sb = fuse_get_sb_blk,
> .kill_sb = kill_block_super,
> - .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV,
> + .fs_flags = FS_REQUIRES_DEV | FS_HAS_SUBTYPE,
> };
>
> static inline int register_fuseblk(void)
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
