* Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in > it. [...] actually, what you said was this: " I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License" the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL compatible.). " and to that the answer was: " The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to accept GPLv3 [...] " in other words: your hypothetical is false today. You called us to do a specific action, but why did you then include a factually false 'example' to underline that point of yours? Or if you simply did not know about the OpenSolaris community's position beforehand, why dont you just admit that and withdraw from that line of argument gracefully? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: "debian developer" <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer <[email protected]>
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21-rt9 - IRQ23 consuming a steady 2.7% of CPU
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):