Chris Wright wrote: > * Theodore Tso ([email protected]) wrote: > > If this doesn't fix a user-visiable bug, should we be including it in > > the stable patch series? (Assuming that it doesn't, I wouldn't, but I > > tend to be more conservative about what I would include in a stable > > production release.) > > Rolf, despite simplicity of patch, I'm inclined to agree with Ted. > Were you effected by this in the wild, or just noticed by code > inspection? Code inspection. Drop it if you like, it's in mainline already.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/54] 2.6.21-stable review
- Prev by Date: Re: v2.6.21.4-rt11
- Next by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [BUG] Oops with KVM-27
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 34/54] Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
- Next by thread: [patch 35/54] USB: set the correct Interrupt interval in usb_bulk_msg
- Index(es):
 |