Andrew Morton wrote:
>> This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
>> all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
>> survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
>
> So these are being proposed for 2.6.22?
Yeap.
> I do wonder about Rafael's bug which he bisected down to
> gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch.
>
> If that won't be a problem in this patchset then I spose it's probably best
> to go ahead with a 2.6.22 merge, but it's more a Greg thing than a me
> thing.
I'm currently debugging that and it's irrelevant to these fixes. The
bug is introduced far after the fixes.
> I don't have a tree to merge these patches into, unless I drop all the
> patches which are in Greg's tree.
>
> Greg, can I leave it up to you to decide how we are to proceed here?
I can rebase all sysfs patches in -mm on top of linus#master + these
fixes if necessary.
Thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]